Pros and Cons of Gender Quotas Essay
There has been a considerable improvement of female representation in many areas of life in the past century: in â€œ2012, women took home more than a third of the medalsâ€ awarded at the London Olympics, but more importantly, â€œthe percentage of women on the boards of the 100 largest companies has risen over the past year to a record of 15. 6%. And in the last six months, 35% of new board appointments to FTSE 250 companies have been womenâ€ (Braund). Many countries, led by Norway, have promoted female representation by implementing gender quotas for corporate boards and they do so because gender quotas increase diversity in the workplace and with increased diversity comes many derivative benefits. Increased diversity by itself is a tremendous benefit; â€œit is in conformity with the notions of equality and representationâ€ (Bilkisu). By increasing diversity on corporate boards, we can â€œgive speedy increase in womenâ€™s representation [and] guarantee â€˜equality of resultsâ€™ for women and men aspirantsâ€ and, in doing so, support the concepts of freedom and liberty that this country was found upon (Bilkisu). Furthermore, not only do gender quotas promote democracy through increased diversity, they also help to defeat the tendencies of groups composed of similar individuals. Corporate boards with members that â€œhave similar backgrounds and have been through similar socialization are more likely than not to share views and presumptions and [are] less likely to engage in vigorous discussion and to challenge managementâ€ (Gratton). Sharing views and presumptions and the reluctance to debate amongst one another results in groupthink, in which group members try to minimize conflict by reaching consensus and therefore create an atmosphere of decreased creativity, uniqueness, and independent thinking. This scenario often exists in all male or majority male corporate boards because â€œthey tend towards â€˜the risky shiftâ€™ which results in them colluding with each other [and] also lack the diverse networks that are so crucial to effective information search and decision makingâ€ (Gratton). Diversity promoted by gender quotas â€œcan provide a wider range of opinion, experience and networking but also can help prevent groupthink that can hinder innovationâ€ (Dong-youb). By introducing more women, businesses can reate an environment that stifles groupthink tendencies and allows for a larger variety of ideas and opinions to be shared. Introducing more women to corporate boards through gender quotas can help the business â€œbetter understand the needs of diverse customers and workersâ€ and with the increasing globalization of the worldâ€™s economy, the customer base and work force for businesses are in fact becoming more diverse (Dong-youb). A better understanding of this increasingly diverse group of people allows the business to service their markets properly and enjoy continued profitability. Additionally, â€œwomen appear to be gradually taking control of the economyâ€¦ women control about 70 percent of household spendingâ€ and with women making more of the economic decisions, the need for more women on corporate boards becomes even more glaringly apparent (Bart). Especially â€œin the consumer sector [where] the products and servicesâ€¦ are mainly bought by women,â€ it is obvious that appointing more women to corporate boards would support the increasing number of female consumers by promoting their interests in business decisions (Gratton). Companies that choose to ignore this shift in society would be wasting the ample amount of talent that exists already, as well as passing up the â€œestimated economic benefits and boost to productivity of increasing female participation in the workforceâ€¦ at 11 percent of gross domestic productâ€ (Coonan). â€œDiversity at the board-level also provides role models at the top of the corporate ladder that encourage aspiring younger employees with non-traditional qualifications or backgroundsâ€ (Dong-youb). There have been an increasing number of women enrolling in higher education in proportion to men and an increase in the number of women on corporate boards would provide those young aspiring women with a role model. However, despite all the benefits that implementing gender quotas could have, there has not been as much change on the makeup of corporate boards as would be expected and there is a group of people that â€œare becoming frustrated by a lack of progress in this area and simply want quotasâ€¦ as a catalyst to disrupt the inertia and stimulate affirmative actionâ€ (Jury). Cons of Gender QuotasÂ While there are many people who see the benefits of gender quotas on corporate boards and strongly support the implementation of such, there are also people who view a gender quota as â€œwrong in principle, has difficulties in practice, is tokenistic and is counterproductive to the end goalâ€ (Jury). Much of the view that gender quotas are not the solution to the lack of diversity on corporate boards can be contributed to the belief that â€œthe fundamental criteria for a board appointment must be talent and appropriatenessâ€ and this belief is shared by both businesses and the women that businesses employ (Gratton). Everyone prefers to be chosen for certain positions based on merit as opposed to being picked for other reasons, since being chosen based on merit acknowledges strengths and dismisses any accusations of preferential treatment, especially when selection processes are transparent. Women facing minority representation on corporate boards are especially adamant that they â€œdonâ€™t want to go on a board as a token gesture[, they] want to be there because itâ€™s meritoriousâ€ (McFarland). Women, just like men, want to be recognized for their skills and achievements and not their appearance or gender; â€œno woman wants to be a token female[,] yet the recent call for quotas of women in the boardroom runs the risk of achieving exactly thatâ€ (Mantzarapis). Implementing a gender quota for corporate boards can affect the dynamics of the workplace negatively by promoting the perception that women are only being appointed onto boards due to gender and not ability. These assumptions and questions concerning the reasons behind the promotion of women all contribute to â€œundermin[ing] her ability from the start and may make it more difficult for her to prove herselfâ€ (Mantzarapis). Even if the company openly claims that its decisions are based only on merit and not gender, the existence of gender quotas alone causes questions to be write my essay discount code asked about the reasons behind a promotion or appointment no matter what the real reasons are. Since a quota system based on gender would undermine the merits of those females who would be appointed to corporate boards, those against gender quotas believe â€œit would be an insult to women and a great disservice to companies if women are appointed to fill quotasâ€¦ as standards will inevitably be compromised when an arbitrary numerical target is set against an unrealistic timelineâ€ (Khoo).
We started with just two employees, working out of a small room. All these years later, we have over 40 employees, but our passion and dedication remain strong. Working with us, you will find we still stay true to our roots.
"This is sample testimonial from a sample source." -- Sample Client, Location
"This is another sample testimonial from another sample source." -- Sample Client, Location